Memo to Soundhertz

Memo to Soundhertz:

I didn’t say what it is yet, S!  I will do so now.

There are a lot of different readings you can do given your interpretation.  I just happened to try to take a whole lot of readings and line them up.  All interpretations are closer to the truth than a specific one, especially if they match.  I am saying they will match point by point in mathematics because the different approaches match point by point.

I would never suggest that theory matching is high science –as mathematicians would suicide in great numbers and I only want a small to medium number of them dead.

I am unbiased and I have covered this before.  IF photons are stopped in time, then the Big Bang never ended and everything is a bang.  I assumed experimentally that an explosion is an umbrella turning inside out –I covered this before.

Then I matched that to the release of a photon;  “whatever a photon means” means nothing to me nor philosophically nor intellectually nor scientifically as I am only doing theory match – -I have also covered this before.

Then…  the assembly stopped.  The umbrella can’t turn completely inside out for a reason external to itself –which would be impossible in a minimal universe, as there is nothing else “out there”.  So it is evident that this “external reason” emitted a “something” and that it was there from the start, otherwise we would have an “external reason” that acts by magic, at a distance.

Therefore what we were considering a photon was actually a part of a photon.  I specified what it was, and it still has no meaning to me even if it isn’t at all called “black-body radiation”.  (do I look as though I know science terminology?)

Did you know that I was suspended from the forum because oh so nice guys recognize their limits?  I didn’t even know I was stretching!  How could I be?  None of this has any meaning to me!  Doesn’t anyone see that?  I barely have to think about it.

If I do theory match and come up with pink elephants throwing balls as a scientific explanation for photons, have no question in your mind that that is exactly what I will write.  I accidentally stumbled upon this field for other reasons which I will keep to myself.  In that sense, neither humbleness nor arrogance never had much use for me, not because I know my subjects, but because I have nothing invested in them, be it scientific or personal or mathematical.  Photonic structure is not up in the air, I am not “testing hypotheses”:  it will be found to be what I say it is, the complete atomic flux description from start to end.  Even on that day it will still mean nothing to me.

Redação

0 Comentário

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *

Você pode fazer o Jornal GGN ser cada vez melhor.

Apoie e faça parte desta caminhada para que ele se torne um veículo cada vez mais respeitado e forte.

Seja um apoiador