Jornal GGN – Lançado por duas acadêmicas brasileiras, o Manifesto em defesa do Estado democrático de Direito no Brasil conta com mais de 100 assinaturas de estudiosos de diversos países, incluindo acadêmicos como os alemães Jürgen Habermas, Axel Honneth e Rainer Forst, a norte-americana Nancy Fraser, o canadense Charles Taylor e o italiano Alessandro Ferrara.
Yara Frateschi e Miriam Madureira apresentaram o manifesto pela primeira vez em maio, durante a Conferência Internacional de Filosofia e Ciências Sociais, em Praga, na República Checa, recebendo apoio da maioria dos participantes e organizadores. Depois, o manifesto foi envaido a outros acadêmicos com relação com a Conferência de Praga e com a Teoria Crítica e Política contemporâneas.
O documento explica o processo de impeachment sofrido pela presidente afastada Dilma Rousseff e afirma que os partidos de direita se aproveitaram de um momento de crise econômica para fazer uma violenta campanha midiática para retirá-la do poder. Também diz que tais partidos pretendem atacar direitos sociais garantidos pelos governos do PT, adotando políticas de desregulamentação da economia e brecar as investigações sobre corrupção.
Leia o manifesto abaixo, em inglês:
MANIFESTO
IN DEFENSE OF THE DEMOCRATIC RULE OF LAW IN BRAZIL
On the 31st of March 1964, a coup d’état installed a civil-military dictatorship in Brazil, inaugurating a dark 21-year period of suspension of civil and political guarantees. Today, 52 years after, the Brazilian people face once more a break of the democratic order. As a result of the acceptance by the Senate of an impeachment process based on accounting irregularities, Dilma Rousseff, who had been elected in 2014 for a mandate of 4 years, was forced, on the 12th of May 2016, to stand down as President of the Republic. Even though this removal is supposed to be temporary, lasting up to 180 days, period during which the senators should reconvene to evaluate the motives that have resulted in the impeachment process, it is unlikely that Dilma should return to office.
Dilma Rousseff’s temporary removal from office is the culmination of a process characterised by unprecedented arbitrariness and polarisation in democratic Brazilian society, perceptible at least since her re-election in 2014. By attributing the recent corruption scandals exclusively to the Worker’s Party’s (PT) administrations (although they were the only ones who had the courage to investigate them through, even when investigations turned against their own) and by manipulating public opinion against the supposed risks of a left-wing takeover of the country, the right-wing opposition to Dilma Rousseff’s government took advantage of the economic crisis that emerged after years of stability and growth and led a violent media campaign against it. It managed to aggregate against the Workers’ Party (PT) and Lula’s and Dilma’s governments large sections of business elites and conservative middles classes, as well as authoritarian sectors represented in Congress and in the Judiciary, evidently aiming the hammering down of the social rights secured by Dilma’s government and the deregulation of economy. Besides, once in power, they will probably decline to further investigate corruption as it is likely to involve their own people, as opposed to Dilma Rousseff, whose probity in the administration of public affairs is not doubted, as corruption charges are not part of the impeachment process.
The impeachment is a juridical tool of extremely restricted scope in Brazilian presidentialism. It is regulated by Art.85 of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, and its use is restricted to cases involving serious offenses (crimes de responsabilidade, “responsibility crimes”) carried out by the President. As the accounting irregularities in the administration of public funds that Dilma Rousseff is accused of are not serious offenses in the sense prescribed by the Constitution, it is evident that this impeachment is not legitimately grounded. Furthermore, the whole process was full of questionable aspects, which contribute to add further illegitimacy to its results. Therefore, it is not an exaggeration to consider the present impeachment process against Dilma Rousseff a white coup, which will yield long-lasting consequences to the democratic Rule of Law in Brazil.
In the face of all this, we consider necessary to state our absolute repudiation of the illegitimate destitution of President Dilma Rousseff, and our strong support for the maintenance of the Rule of Law in Brazil.
-
Albena Azmanova – University of Kent, Belgium
-
Alessandro Ferrara – University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
-
Alessandro Pinzani – UFSC, Brazil
-
Alina Valjent – Witten/Herdecke University – Germany
-
Allan Breedlove –Loyola University Chicago, USA
-
Alois Blumentritt – University Wien, Austria
-
Amy Allen – Pennsylvania State University – USA
-
Anahi Wiedenburg – London School of Economics, Argentina/UK
-
André de Macedo Duarte – UFPR, Brazil
-
André Medina Carone – UNIFESP, Brazil
-
Andreas Niederberger – Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany
-
Anna Dißmann – Witten/Herdecke University – Germany
-
Arthur Oliveira Bueno –University of Erfurt, Germany
-
Asger Sorensen – Aarhus University, Denmark
-
Axel Honneth – University of Frankfurt/Columbia University, Germany/USA
-
Aysen Candas – Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
-
Barbara Fultner – Denison University, USA
-
Bernat Riutort Serra – University of Illes Ballears –Spain
-
Brian Milstein – Goethe University Frankfurt, USA/Germany
-
Carlos Costa Dantas – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
-
Carlos Henrique Santana – TU Darmstadt, Germany
-
Charles Taylor – Mc Gill University, Canada
-
Christopher Zurn – University of Massachussetts/Boston, USA
-
Cora McKeena – Trinity College, Ireland
-
Cristina Sánchez – Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
-
Dan Swain – Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic
-
Daniele Santoro – CNR, National Research Council of Italy, Italy
-
David Alvarez – University of Minho/Braga, Portugal
-
David Rasmussen – Boston College, USA
-
Debora Spini – Syracuse University in Florence, Italy
-
Dónal O’Farrell – Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
-
Elisabeth v. Thadden – University of Jena, Germany
-
Felicia Herrschaft – Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
-
Filip Vostal – Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
-
Firica Stefan – University of Bucharest, Romania
-
Francisco Naishtat – Universidad de Buenos Aires –Argentina
-
François Calori – Université de Rennes 1, France
-
Gesche Keding – Jena University, Germany
-
Gisleine Aver – UFSC, Brazil
-
Giulia Lasagni – Università de Parma, Italy
-
Giuseppe Ballacci – University of Minho, Portugal
-
Gorana Ognjenovich – University of Oslo, Norway
-
Gustavo Leyva Martínez – Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México
-
Hans-Herbert Kögler – University of North Florida, USA
-
Hartmut Rosa – Jena University, Germany
-
Heikki Ikäheimo – University of New South Wales, Australia
-
Igor Shoikhedbrod – University of Toronto, Canada
-
Isadora Henrichs – Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
-
Italo Testa – Parma University, Italy
-
Jazna Jozelic – University of Oslo, Norway
-
João Honoreto – University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany
-
Joaquín Valdivielso-Navarro – Universitat Illes Balears, Spain
-
Johan Söderberg – Göteborg University, Sweden
-
Johanna Oksala – University of Helsinki, Finland
-
Johannes Schulz – Frankfurt University, Germany
-
John Lumsden – University of Essex, UK
-
Jonathan Bowman – University of Arkansas, USA
-
José Adauto de Souza Neto – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
-
Julian Culp – University of Frankfurt, Germany
-
Jürgen Habermas – J.W. Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany
-
Karoline Rhein – Witten/Herdecke University – Germany
-
Kendralyn Webber –University of California Riverside, USA
-
Lenny Moss – University of Exeter, UK
-
Leonardo da Hora Pereira – Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, France
-
Lorenz Mrones – University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany
-
Luiz Gustavo de Cunha de Souza – Institut für Sozialforschung/Frankfurt –Germany
-
Marco Solinas – Florence University, Italy
-
Marek Hrubec – Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
-
Maria Ines Bergoglio – Universidad nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
-
María José Guerra – Universidad de Laguna –Spain
-
María Pía Lara – Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico
-
Marjan Ivkovic – University of Belgrade, Serbia
-
Mark Haugaard – University Galway – Ireland
-
Marlon Urizar Natareno, Universidad Rafael Landívar, Guatemala
-
Martin Javornicky – University of Galway, Ireland
-
Martin Sauter – n/a –Ireland
-
Martin Seel – J.W.Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany
-
Masao Higarashi – Ritsumeikan University –Japan
-
Matteo Bianchin – University of Milano, Italy
-
Matthias Kettner – University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany
-
Matthias Lutz-Bachmann – J.W. Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany
-
Melis Menent – University of Sussex, UK
-
Miriam Mesquita Sampaio de Madureira – Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México
-
Mykhailo Minakov – Kiev-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine
-
Nancy Fraser –New School for Social Research, USA
-
Nancy Love –Appalachian State University, USA
-
Natalia Frozel Barros –University of Paris 1, France
-
Nathan Cogné – Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
-
Nicola Patruno – Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
-
Niklas Angebauer – University of Essex, UK
-
Odin Lysaker – Agder University, Norway
-
Ojvind Larsen – Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
-
Onni Hirvonen – University of Jyväskylä, Finland
-
Pablo Gilabert – Concordia University, Canada
-
Patrick O’Mahonny – University College Cork –Ireland
-
Pedro Augusto Pinho – UES-RJ/UFRJ, Brazil
-
Pedro Federici Araujo – PUC/RJ – Brasil
-
Philipp Schink – J.W. Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany
-
Philippe Sonnet – Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
-
Pierre Schwarzer – Universität Witten/Herdecke, Germany
-
Radu Neculau – University of Windsor, Canada
-
Rahel Jaeggi – Humboldt University Berlin, Germany
-
Rainer Forst – University of Frankfurt, Germany
-
Richard Stahel – University of Constantin the Philosopher in Nitra, Slovak Republic
-
Robert Fine – Warwick University, UK
-
Roberta Ramos Marques – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
-
Robin Celikates – University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
Rodrigo Cordero – Universidad Diego Portales –Chile
-
Ronan Kaczyznski – Goethe University, Germany
-
Rosie Worsdale – University of Essex, UK
-
Ruy Fausto – USP/Université de Paris 8, Brazil/France
-
Sandra Cruz – UNIFESP, Brazil
-
Steven L. White – Wayne State University, USA
-
Susan L. Foster – UCLA, USA
-
Thomas Fossen – Leiden University, The Netherlands
-
Valerio Fabbrizi – University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy
-
Wolfgang Heuer – Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
-
Yara Frateschi – UNICAMP, Brazil
-
Zuzana Uhde – Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
Você pode fazer o Jornal GGN ser cada vez melhor.
Apoie e faça parte desta caminhada para que ele se torne um veículo cada vez mais respeitado e forte.
Fora Temer
“O grupo que está no poder é uma quadrilha de ladrões, de bandidos orgânicos da vida republicana brasileira.”
Ciro Gomes
Vários manifestos coletivos e
Vários manifestos coletivos e textos individuais de intelectuais, artistas e políticos do mundo contra o golpe, esse agora com o apoio de Habermas, um dos últimos grandes filósofos vivos. E a mídia golpista no Brasil não os noticia. Isso sem falar em artigos, reportagens e até editoriais dos principais jornais mundiais.
Como disse Lula, para a mídia golpista do Brasil Dilma desapareceu, não existe mais. Aliás, quando falam dela, de Lula e do PT é só pra difamar.
Vergonha internacional o jornalixo brasileiro.
Um leque muito amplo de
Um leque muito amplo de instituições de pesquisa ao redor do mundo em países com tradições políticas muito distintas. Isso prova o grau de rejeição do golpe no mundo. Tem até uma parente do Papa.
Democracia
Não avisaram aos acadêmicos que não fecharam jornais,não censuraram a Imprensa, não fecharam o Parlamento, e foi tudo feito de acordo com a Suprema Corte(STF)…
Mal informados por mal intencionados.
Aliás ,prenderam outro ladrão que foi super importante nestes governos populistas-demagógicos que finalmente cairam,por si.
Aloísio Daher de Melo.
Descoberta astronômica: umbigo de tucano golpista é buraco negro
Alô, ísio, quer dizer que tantos profissionais da ciência, que têm como ferramenta de trabalho uma metodologia chamada Método Científico- já ouviu falar?- que consiste em checar as fontes, foram desinformados pelos petralhas? Ou se venderam por mortadela?